Literal copying of GPL code into ZFS on Linux

Recently, Canonical has announced that they plan to ship zfsonlinux in compiled form from their "main" repository. They rely on advice from their lawyers that the compiled form of zfs.ko, the kernel loadable module implementing zfs, is not a derivative of the linux kernel. This is important, because if zfsonlinux is a derivative of both GPL code and CDDL code, the two licenses impose incompatible requirements on the compiled form of the software, and distribution is not possible. (This is in contrast to Debian's plan to ship zfs in source form only in their next release (and also in the somewhat ghettoized "contrib" section rather than "main"); this is considered safer by many because the GPL's restrictions on code in source format are less stringent than code in object code or executable format)

There are two main ways that zfsonlinux's zfs.ko could be a derivative work of linux: First, and the option that many commenters have concentrated on, is if the act of compiling zfs also includes copyrighted portions of linux in a way that activates the GPL's restrictions because the combined work is "a work based on [the Linux kernel]". However, there is a second way that zfsonlinux could be subject to the GPL and CDDL simultaneously: if source code licensed exclusively under the GPL has been copied into the zfsonlinux source tree.

In this article, I collect some samples of code from zfsonlinux and compare those samples to code committed earlier to linux. I present the samples using a customized word diff algorithm. To reproduce my results, you will need to manually find the associated refs in linux.git and zfsonlinux/zfs.git and use your own word-diff algorithm.

I don't know whether I've found the worst of the code copying; I found the two examples given below pretty quickly, imagined that I had found just the tip of the iceberg, and then decided to write this article before looking for more. But I haven't found any more that are as clear-cut as these two examples are in my mind, while also being over ten lines long. Beginner's luck? Or did I find the 50 copied lines out of 260,000 lines in a half hour and that's the whole story?

Because I cannot speak for the authors of the code committed to linux.git which appear to be duplicated in zfsonlinux, it is impossible for me to say whether they have some private arrangement with the code authors that permit the use of the code snippets under the CDDL. If not, it's a legal question whether the amount of code copied is relevant under copyright law. In this area, I imagine caution is best; after all, in the US, Google's copying of the 9-line "RangeCheck" function (out of how many million lines in the JRE?) has been determined not to be de minimis, though in a new trial Google will assert a fair use defense regarding that copying.

(note: some popular RSS readers do not show the color coding of insertions and deletions)

Snippet A: linux at commit 5f99f4e79abc64ed9d93a4b0158b21c64ff7f478

Snippet B: zfsonlinux at commit 0f37d0c8bed442dd0d2c1b1dddd68653fa6eec66

Common text

static inline bool dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx,
                           const char *name, int namelen,
                           u64
    uint64_t ino, unsigned type)
{
       return ctx->actor(ctx->dirent, name, namelen, ctx->pos, ino, type) == 0;
}
static inline bool dir_emit_dot(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
{
       return ctx->actor(ctx->dirent, ".", 1, ctx->pos,
                         file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_ino, DT_DIR) == 0;
}
static inline bool dir_emit_dotdot(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
{
       return ctx->actor(ctx->dirent, "..", 2, ctx->pos,
                         parent_ino(file->f_path.dentry), DT_DIR) == 0;
}
static inline bool dir_emit_dots(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
{
       if (ctx->pos == 0) {
               if (!dir_emit_dot(file, ctx))
                       return false;
               ctx->pos = 1;
       }
       if (ctx->pos == 1) {
               if (!dir_emit_dotdot(file, ctx))
                       return false;
               ctx->pos = 2;
       }
       return true;
}

Snippet A: linux at c3c532061e46156e8aab1268f38d66cfb63aeb2d

Snippet B: zfsonlinux at 5547c2f1bf49802835fd6c52f15115ba344a2a8b

Common text

static inline int bdi_setup_and_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, char *name,
                           unsigned int cap)
{
        char tmp[32];
        int errerror;

        bdi->name = name;
        bdi->capabilities = cap;
        errerror = bdi_init(bdi);
        if (errerror)
                return err;(error);

        sprintf(tmp, "%.28s%s", name, "-%d");
        errerror = bdi_register(bdi, NULL, tmp, atomic_long_inc_return(&bdi_seqzfs_bdi_seq));
        if (errerror) {
                bdi_destroy(bdi);
                return err;(error);
        }

        return 0;(error);
}

Need another reminder to steer clear of non-Free software?

It's played out over and over again on proprietary platforms: the vendor decides that this or that component should be deleted from user machines, and as if by magic it happens, without regard to the fact that user systems will encounter reduced functionality as a result.

Well, through its "Partner" archive, Ubuntu is in the unenviable position of doing the same thing.

Debian? Sounds good to me!

Back at the start of October, I decided to use Debian Squeeze to fill an empty partition on my laptop hard drive. Since then, I've been seeing a lot of Ubuntu news that makes me consider using Debian instead of Ubuntu for future Linux installations.

Installing Ubuntu 9.10 on TA790GX XE + AMD Athlon II X2 245 Regor

Ingrid's organization got a grant to pay for all-new desktop PCs. The systems aren't particularly cutting-edge, so I didn't anticipate problems installing the systems. To my horror, 32-bit Ubuntu 9.10 consistently blackscreened when trying to boot the live CD. Booting without 'splash quiet', the last message was the unhelpful "Disabling lockdep due to kernel taint". Short answer: boot Linux with 'nomce' and/or install a BIOS update. Read on for more details.

Breezy Apt Repository / Deb Mirror

In the last few months, Ubuntu removed the Breezy .deb packages from their main servers. I finally found that the files have been moved to http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/.

Jeff Epler's blog

Literal copying of GPL code into ZFS on Linux

Need another reminder to steer clear of non-Free software?

Debian? Sounds good to me!

Installing Ubuntu 9.10 on TA790GX XE + AMD Athlon II X2 245 Regor

Breezy Apt Repository / Deb Mirror